The proposed new regulations on how to deal with aircraft disruptions, according to the National Airlines Council of Canada’s head, “feel little of” responding to concerns made by various organizations, including regions, unions, airports, and airlines. Jeff Morrison, president and CEO of the council, said” significant concerns” were raised by the different groups during consultations by the Canadian Transportation Agency ( CTA ) in 2023, with issues around regional connectivity, cost of air travel and ability to meet regulatory requirements all raised to officials. According to Morrison,” the proposed regulations do not take into account the difficult operational reality of airlines, because they provide for requirements that are expensive, burdensome, and do not take into account the complex functional reality of those companies,” they do not address these issues. ” If adopted, they would impact affordability and accessibility for Canadians” .On Saturday, the CTA put out their proposed new regulations on flights ‘ commitments to guests whose flights are disrupted, even when the delays or cancellations are caused by an “exceptional circumstances” outside the companies ‘ power. The Air Passenger Protection Regulations may require air companies to offer meals to people whose flights are delayed by at least two hours and, if approved, overnight accommodations. Payments would also have to be provided within 15 times, down from the latest 30-day condition, if a customer prefers to be reimbursed rather than rebooked when their trip is cancelled, delayed at least three hours, or they’re bumped from the trip. 2: 12
Air Canada ordered to pay family$ 10, 000Under the current federal rules, passengers must be compensated with up to$ 2, 400 if they were denied boarding because a trip was overbooked, with delays and other payments for cancelled flights warranting compensation of up to$ 1, 000. The “exceptional circumstances” noted by the CTA include security threats, unscheduled airport closures, bird strikes, weather or aircraft damage that could affect flight safety, among other examples. However, according to the new regulations, airlines are generally not required to compensate passengers for any inconveniences caused by those circumstances, but this article provides examples of when the carriers are required to do so despite those circumstances. According to Transport Minister Anita Anand, the reforms aim to make the regulations simpler for both travelers and air travelers. Trending Now
Ex-OpenA I engineer who filed legal questions about the technology he helped create passed away.
Chrystia Freeland, popular with some MPs, criticized by others
” The proposed amendments eliminate grey zones and ambiguity about when passengers are owed compensation, which will ensure quicker resolutions for passengers”, she said in a statement. Canada’s passenger rights charter, in place since 2019, previously divided flight disruptions into three categories — those caused by factors within the carriers control, disruptions within their control but required for safety purposes, and those outside the airline’s control. 2: 03
WestJet back in court over passenger expensesOnly the first category allowed for compensation, but the CTA said the system was too complex and led to “varied and differing interpretations” by passengers and carriers. Morrison continued, saying that the actions taken by airlines already had improved air travel performance and provided more reliable and predictable service. The federal government should concentrate its efforts on enhancing the competitiveness of the overall air travel system and its affordability, he said,” and we strongly believe that the system needs to be made more affordable.” He added that this should include reviewing all federal fees and charges, as well as changing the CTA claims adjudication process to lessen the “existing backlog.” The 75-day feedback period is now available on the proposed changes. —with files from The Canadian Press&, copy 2024 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.
