For several weeks, a media and judicial campaign has been aimed at discrediting a well-known player in the Senegalese media landscape. The facts which are reproached to him, widely relayed, deserve to be recalled in their context, far from amalgamations and manipulation. 1. the A contract in good and due form. The case arose out of a subcontracting contract signed in full legality with Ellipse Projects International for a period of ten years for the technical and administrative support of a vast programme of construction of judicial and penitentiary infrastructures. This contract is duly drawn up and documented, duly registered in Senegal. The payments made in this context and charged to Ms Diagne Mame Bintou represent an amount of approximately CFAF 1 billion, collected by means of eight cheques spread over six years, which is evidence that the payments were made in order to fulfil contractual commitments. The bill is still far from the 21 billion announced everywhere. The work carried out required the involvement of local and foreign contractors, including Turkish, Iranian, Israeli and Ivorian contractors, who contributed their expertise to the project. The second.
The case of Madiambal Diagne: for truth and justice
