(BPRW) NAACP Files Amicus Brief in Arkansas Battling for Voting Rights Across the Region  

The NAACP filed an amicus brief in Arkansas’s effort to fight for equal rights in the region ( Black PR Wire ) WASHINGTON – The court will hear Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians v. Howe en banc, before all of the court’s active judges. The brief challenges the court’s alarming decision to stop people and organizations from filing lawsuits under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA ), a crucial preventative measure against racial discrimination in elections. This decision had successfully end Black, Brown, and Aboriginal communities in Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota from being able to challenge racial discrimination laws if allowed to stand. The Department of Justice, which announced its decision to reject all engaged voting rights cases under the present President, would have to file any such behavior. The legislation becomes irrelevant in the Eighth Circuit without the assistance of NAACP General Counsel Janette McCarthy-Wallace, who stated,” Without the ability for people and civil rights organizations to maintain Part 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the legislation becomes irrelevant in the Eighth Circuit. Every judge on this Court should be alarmed by those who attempt to erode our voting strength unregulated. The notion that the Department of Justice exclusively can or now would bear the cost of upholding our fundamental rights defies both current and historical fact. The Arkansas State Conference and others who demand whole, en banc evaluation of this risky decision are proud to support the NAACP because it is unconstitutional to silence Black, Brown, and Indigenous voices. Another defendants have since attempted to do justice through Section 1983 promises, but the Eighth Circuit has since decided that Section 1983 claims are also barred there. The DOJ has made it clear that the limited resources available to it stop it from completely enforcing the Voting Rights Act on its own,” according to Barry Jefferson, chairman of the NAACP Arkansas State Conference. ” That’s why the ability to pursue personal dispute has always been important. The people of Arkansas and the whole Eighth Circuit are without protection from voter suppression that cannot be tolerated because of this decision, which highlights the damaging effects it would have on black communities and calls for the Eighth Circuit to reconsider and overturn its decision. # ##About NAACPThe NAACP fights, fights, and fights for the civil rights that are required for Black America. Our tradition is based on the principles of grassroots activism established by the biggest legal rights advocates of the 20th century, and it is maintained by protesters of the 21st century. Our community of users across the nation fights to stop racial bias by working from classrooms and courthouses to town halls and Congress. That work is based on cultural equality, political commitment, and support for all disadvantaged individuals. We are committed to a planet free of prejudice in which Black people can have equal opportunities in prosperous areas. The Legal Defense Fund, also known as the NAACP-LDF, was established in 1940 as a division of the NAACP, but it still operates as a totally independent organization. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *